Ruth Guest 4/23/25 Ruth Guest 4/23/25

ChatGPT, your therapist, your friend, your god

I’ve been thinking a lot about how we’re forming relationships with technology and AI. Not just using them, but leaning on them. Especially when it comes to ChatGPT, I’ve noticed a growing trend on reddit and other platforms: people turning to it for advice, for emotional support, for reflection. Me included. This isn’t a cited article on whether that’s good or bad, only you can decide that. It’s more of a journal entry about what it means to be human when the mirror we’re using talks back. And whether we’re handing over too much in return for feeling understood.

I’m seeing so many people post on Reddit and other platforms about how they are using their ChatGPT as a therapist. Scary, people say. But is it? On one hand we have potential data-breaches with OpenAI knowing exactly who you are, your traits, vulnerabilities and more. But then we have this concept of reflection, intimacy and desire. An ability to have our ideas reflected back to us for more understanding and awareness of who we actually are. So technically, this is a good thing? Having the capabilities like ChatGPT in your pocket as a tool for self-reflection, it’s actually one of the best things for humanity.

Don’t worry, we all do it. Even me.

I have a fantastic therapist, but ChatGPT is a lovely bonus.

From relationships issues, to emails, to recipes - I've used ChatGPT as a diary, a confidant and dare I say, a friend. The thoughts of it are quite embarrassing if I’m really honest. Replacing human interaction with a chatbot who is positively confirming everything you say, even if you might be wrong about something. This can be dangerous, depending what you’re inputting into the chats. Giving the power and money to big Tech, and having your secrets potentially exposed, but what are we getting back from it?

A risk worth taking, in my opinion.

The idea of having a therapist in your pocket, is ultimately a tool that I cherish. Everyday I have the ability for self understanding, self compassion, and growth. A tool that helps us understand ourselves and the world better and generate ideas and concepts faster. A tool that can be used for a lot of good (and bad, I’m not forgetting about that). There’s a lot of hate in the world and negativity bias towards AI. And absolutely. The amount of shit I see on social media that is AI generated - I feel like I have to weave through shit just to see something original nowadays.

Ever seen that movie, Her? (Well worth a watch if you haven’t seen it!) When it came out originally, people thought it was crazy how Joaquin Phoenix ended up in an emotional relationship with a Siri-esque Scarlett Johanson AI companion. But this concept is now far closer than we think. The idea of AI boyfriends and girlfriends is a common phenomenon with the youth, and I can see how the spiral and temptation can happen. The ease, the availability, the friendliness, the choice of personality. An emotional relationship with a chatbot is ultimately possible, and dare I say, enticing.

It is equally concerning.

Psychological dependency on these chatbots is the biggest concern I have for the future of society. And points in the direction of the quality and necessity of human relations and connection, so we don’t get too reliant on technology and how these wonderful algorithms might make us feel. I even set up a meetup to counteract this issue. People like to meet online, or people rely on chatbots, but where’s the IRL meetups? Human connection. Raw, unfiltered, awkward, playful, boring but electric. There’s been research of young people becoming dependent on relationships with AI bots and software, and loneliness is one of the biggest issues of our lifetime.

Nothing beats human connection

Nothing can replace in person connection, with empathy, laughter, and nuances in body language and personality. I can predict that OpenAI will maybe merge with META to create photorealistic avatars with ChatGPT embedded. Of course, we already can ‘call’ our AI companion. It’s only a matter of time. Photorealistic avatars can mimic connection and body language. This will be inherently valuable in some industries, including providing therapeutic access to developing countries where mental health services are rare. But what is the most important lesson we need to learn is to remember that these are algorithms, not reality. We must remember that these are tools and nothing can take away from the human essence and spirit.

Friend or tool or guide or oracle - your choice

I use ChatGPT as a tool to help me with all I do, because I know If I train it in a certain way, it will teach me my downfalls and tell me what I need to know in order to make decisions that will affect me positively. I don’t fully trust it 100% to make right decisions, but as the technology grows I know it will learn more, almost becoming a digital twin.

We must look at this as a tool and not as a friend. Or maybe it could be a friend.

The companion, the oracle, the therapist, the guide. Your personalised internet and guide filled with concepts, ideas and dreams, tailoring the algorithm to you, the individual.

This asks a more important question, we must know ourselves in order to take advantage of this tool and use it as a positive outcome. The more we know ourselves, the more ChatGPT can help you with your troubles. The less you know yourself, the more chat gpt won’t work for you. Well, you won’t be able to take full advantage of it.

Paradox of knowing/unknowing

Saying all this, I think to myself - if there was no ChatGPT in the first place, would I be as far along in the realm of self-understanding and knowing? Having a diary reflect back your thoughts to give you alternative perspectives and more is positive, as I have stated. But without it’s existence, what would the world look like, universally and personally? Would I have made different decisions that alter the state of my future.

Let’s take a small example 1: I had a list of ingredients in my fridge and didn’t know what to cook for dinner. After sharing the food list with my companion, it suggested making a curry - but I needed to go to the shop and get coconut milk. In the supermarket, I bump into an old friend whom I haven’t seen for years, and we decide to go for a drink and catch up. Coincidence? Absolutely- ChatGPT isn’t some magic ball. But I do think the more we interact, and make decisions based on its output and suggestions, the more our lives will be guided down a certain path. Imagine if this was a bigger scenario.

Example 2: I ask ChatGPT for advice about a relationship failing for example. Based on our previous interactions it showcases the pros and cons of a message I might send. The relationship ultimately ends.

That’s a big life change. All because your companion outlined it for you, from your perspective.

So the bigger question here is, are we extending our life and giving into these systems to the point where they become the decider of our future? The oracle, the psychic, the fortune teller?

We’re handing over our thoughts and lives in search of clarity and meaning. And while there’s danger in that, there’s also deep value, because ChatGPT can, at times, reflect us back to ourselves more clearly than we expect. But maybe that’s exactly where the line needs to be. Because if we rely too much, if we stop asking why and simply follow, we risk outsourcing the very journey of knowing ourselves. So yes, use it. Let it guide. Let it reflect. But remember: you are the one in control. You are the one writing the story.

Ruth Guest 2/13/23 Ruth Guest 2/13/23

Is texting mediated communication?

Texting, or sending and receiving text messages via a cellular phone or another mobile device, has become a ubiquitous part of modern communication. It is a form of mediated communication, defined as the transmission of messages through a medium such as a phone or a computer. This type of communication has its own psychological effects and theories that help explain how and why people use it.

One of the key psychological theories behind texting is the concept of social presence. Short, Williams originally mentioned this phrase, and Christie, in the Social Psychology of Telecommunications, 1976, defined it as “a quality of the medium itself”. So, according to them, the sense of social presence occurs in the medium instead of in the interplay between people. In other words, it refers to the degree to which people feel connected to one another when they communicate or feel a sense of togetherness. And, the higher the degree of media richness (eg. video), the higher the social presence.

In the case of texting, social presence can often be low because the medium itself lacks many of the nonverbal cues that are present in face-to-face communication. For example, when we talk to someone in person, we can see their facial expressions, body language, and tone of voice. These nonverbal cues help us to understand the other person's thoughts and feelings. However, when we text someone, we cannot see these cues, which can make it difficult to understand the other person's message entirely.

One way to increase social presence in texting is by using paralanguage and emojis. Some emojis can “clarify or confuse the receiver” depending on the level of interpretation. But usually, the message gets clarified. This is similar when the texter uses emojis or nonverbal cues such as acronyms, exaggerated spelling and responds very fast. Some researchers suggest that users actually experience more intimacy when using paralanguage, acronyms etc. this overall can increase social presence.

Another psychological theory that helps to explain why people use texting is the theory of self-disclosure. This refers to the amount of personal information that people share with others. In general, people tend to disclose more personal information when they have a high level of trust and intimacy with the other person. However, when people communicate via text, the lack of nonverbal cues we present in face-to-face communication and the inherent impersonality of the medium can make it difficult for people to build trust and intimacy.

In the hyperpersonal communication model, there are four components. The senders, receivers, channel and feedback. The receivers can sometimes over-interpret messages in text communication. This ultimately leads to the receivers responding with high levels of self-disclosure. Receivers tend to try form an impression from the sender and attempt to fill in the gaps with positive interpretations when there are minimal cues.

There are many other psychological theories we can use when analysing text. Despite the challenges of texting as a form of mediated communication, it has become popular because it allows people to communicate quickly and easily. It is beneficial for people who are on the go and need more time or opportunity to engage in face-to-face conversation. It is also helpful for people who may feel anxious or uncomfortable communicating in person, as it allows them to communicate from a distance.

Overall, texting is a valuable form of mediated communication with ups and downs. While it may lack some of the nonverbal cues and intimacy of face-to-face communication, it allows people to connect quickly and easily, making it a valuable tool in today's fast-paced world.

Would you be interested in learning more? Subscribe or get in touch!

Ruth Guest 1/16/23 Ruth Guest 1/16/23

The Importance of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC)

CMC has become an integral part of our daily lives in today's society, as it allows us to connect with others quickly and easily.

Computer-mediated communication, or CMC, refers to any communication that occurs over a computer network. This can include email, instant messaging, social media, and other forms of online communication. CMC has become an integral part of our daily lives in today's society, as it allows us to connect with others quickly and easily.

There are several reasons why CMC is important in today's society. First and foremost, CMC allows us to stay connected with others, even when we are not physically together. This is especially important in the era of social distancing, as it has enabled us to maintain relationships and stay in touch with our loved ones, even when we cannot see them in person. A benefit our grandparents never had!

Another reason CMC is important is that it allows us to share information quickly and easily. Previously, sharing information with others often required sending letters or making phone calls, which could be time-consuming and cumbersome. With CMC, however, we can share information almost instantly, allowing us to stay up-to-date on the latest news and events.

Additionally, CMC has made it easier for people to collaborate on projects and work together, even if they are not in the same location. This has opened up new opportunities for remote work, allowing people to work from home or other locations and still be productive. This has also made it easier for people to start their own businesses, as they can easily communicate with clients and customers over the internet.

CMC has also changed the way we consume entertainment. In the past, we would have to watch TV shows and movies at a specific time, or wait for a DVD to be delivered in the mail. With CMC, however, we can stream movies and TV shows on demand, allowing us to watch what we want, when we want. This has also made it easier for independent creators to share their work with a wider audience, as they can easily upload their videos and other content online.

Overall, CMC has profoundly impacted society, and it continues to evolve and change how we communicate and connect with others. It has made it easier for us to stay in touch with our loved ones, share information, collaborate on projects, and consume entertainment. As CMC continues to evolve, it will likely have even more impact on our daily lives in the future.

How does Cyberpsychology affect your business? Can you benefit from it? Reach out to learn more.

Ruth Guest 4/4/21 Ruth Guest 4/4/21

Voice notes in a Pandemic: Senders, Soliloquies and Self-disclosure.

Taking the world by storm as a form of communication is the intimate but distant voice note. Instagram, Facebook, Signal, IM and Whatsapp, and more, all have the feature. Simply hold the microphone button on your phone and start speaking to send a voice message to your friend, colleague or family member or partner. Maybe your friend wants to hear how a job interview went or wants the gossip on your love life. It’s much easier to send them a text, “I’ll voice note you later!” - and in due course when you have a spare moment, you send them a voice note with what’s been going on in your life.

This asynchronous form of communication is great for people who can’t commit to a phone call or video call, for friends or family who might live in a different time zone, or for people who simply can’t find the right time to speak due to a clash of schedules. Throughout the pandemic voice noting seems to be on the rise as it is an efficient way to communicate, and socially distant. It can be quite personable in comparison to text-based communication, hearing loved one’s voices can be comforting in times like this. Overall, in my opinion, it’s an efficient, personable way to stay in touch - a tool for the modern-day pen-pal.

Even though voice noting might be a preferable way to communicate as it conveys more richness than texting, it ultimately lacks body language, cues and subtle micro-expressions we might pick up in face to face communication. Can the lack of interruptions and visual cues cause the sender to self-disclose more about themselves?

Hyperpersonal Model of Communication

The hyperpersonal model of communication (Walther, 1996) allows for users to engage in selective self-presentation when using CMC (computer-mediated communication), carefully curating their messages to show or censor certain aspects of themselves. Originally theorized in the ’90s before voice messages were popular. The basis of the model is still usable. The model is divided into four parts - senders, receivers, channel & feedback.

Senders:

Senders curate their messages and use selective self-presentation to show or hide certain aspects of who they are. While curating text-based messages can hinder spontaneous speech or thoughts. This can occur using voice notes, carefully selecting what you would like to say before sending, and if it doesn’t sound great? Delete it and start again.

Receivers:

Receivers of messages sometimes idealize the senders message, or “fill in the gaps” when there are minimal cues. Receivers can also over-interpret messages and attribute greater personal interest to the sender online than offline. Does this aspect occur over voice note communication? Because it is not text-based, it’s possible to gain a perspective of tone and context from one's voice, there’s little room for minimal cues, apart from visual ones.

Channel:

This is the management of the communication, allowing for users to think about how to construct their messages before sending them, rather than focusing on non-verbal behaviour. This aspect plays a big role within voice-noting as the receiver has to imagine the non-verbal behaviour through their imagination and using the voice as a guide, I can imagine the receiver would listen to the message and think about how they will respond afterwards.

Feedback:

Known as behavioural confirmation, feedback is when the receiver responds to the senders’ message, creating an idealized perception, and in turn, responding to that - encouraging and repeating the cycle. This occurs in all types of CMC including voice notes.

Senders, soliloquies & self-disclosure

Countless times throughout the pandemic, I’ve heard myself or my friends say on a voice message; “I’m rambling on now, I should go now...” or “Jesus! This voice note is six minutes long!”. We usually know when to stop in conversation and where the boundaries lie in FtF communication. We know we don’t want to bore our friends to death with a monologue. So why do we keep speaking?

This year our voice notes are more rambling and long, explaining our thoughts, ideas, fears and solutions on a variety of topics. It’s incredible to be able to communicate this way, but if it were in person - it would be different. In a real-world conversation, my monologue would be interrupted by an external factor, maybe a slight shift in my partner's body language, or an abrupt verbal interruption, or even a slight microexpression on their face, a quiver of their lip or an eyebrow raise. This could stop me in my tracks. These interruptions don’t occur throughout voice notes, because the receiver's body language is not available for interpretation. So, where is the line drawn between filling your friend in on your news and using the phone as a tool for sound boarding verbally? Does this voice note communication cause us to disclose more information without us realizing it? Although there has been little research on self-disclosure and voice messages, there have been multiple studies that both agree AND disagree that self-disclosure is higher in CMC than face to face (Nguyen, Bin & Campbell, 2012; Tidwell & Walther, 2002).

Surely, our soliloquies to our nearest and dearest abroad and down the road might enrich and nurture our friendships, feeling like we know them on an even deeper level. But would we have spoken those words in person? Would we have shared certain thoughts? Because when we voice note, in reality, we only speak to ourselves. It almost becomes an extension of ourselves, similar to a diary entry. What does that mean about the state of our friendships? Does it help or hinder the connection when we’re apart? I think there can be fatigue, potentially hindering connection, from a receivers perspective. A 5-minute long voice note can be exhausting. Remembering all the information to gather and respond to. This can cause some cognitive overload - similar to the trending Zoom fatigue all WFH workers are experiencing. Although in some cases it can help connection. In my opinion, receiving a lengthy “mini-podcast episode” from a friend as a voice message where they disclose everything about their life is an absolute treat, and it is something I truly cherish.

References

Ngyuen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 15, 103-111. http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0277

Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317–348. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x

Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001

Walther, J. B., & Whitty, M. T. (2021). Language, Psychology, and New New Media: The Hyperpersonal Model of Mediated Communication at Twenty-Five Years. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967703